Personal stories about mechanical and tissue replacement aortic valves

Content provided by Healthwise

Personal stories about mechanical and tissue replacement aortic valves

These stories are based on information gathered from health professionals and consumers. They may be helpful as you make important health decisions.

Roy, age 25: I was born with a bicuspid aortic valve. The valve has two leaflets instead of the three it's supposed to have. I'm going to have a mechanical valve, mainly because of my age—I'm only 25, so I know that if I have a tissue valve, I'll have to have it replaced at least once, and probably twice. My doctor says that tissue valves also can become hardened in younger people.

Rhonda, age 72: When I found out that I had a narrowed aortic valve, I talked with my doctor about what type of valve I should have. We agreed that because I'm 72, a tissue valve would be fine. They last for 10 to 15 years, and sometimes as long as 20. Besides, I won't have to take anticoagulants every day for the rest of my life.

Chantal, age 51: I take anticoagulants for another heart condition. My doctor said that because I take this medicine anyway, I should consider having a mechanical valve because it will last longer than a tissue valve.

Maurice, age 57: I decided to have a tissue replacement valve because I have a history of bleeding stomach ulcers. If I get a mechanical valve, I will need to take anticoagulants every day, and they can increase the risk of bleeding. So a tissue valve is a better option for me.

Credits

Last updated:	November 17, 2005
Author:	Robin Parks, MS
Reviewed By:	E. Gregory Thompson, MD - Internal Medicine, George Philippides, MD - Cardiology
Editors:	Kathleen M. Ariss, MS, Pat Truman